<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scotch on the Rocks, day 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.borrewessel.com/2008/06/05/scotch-on-the-rocks-day-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.borrewessel.com/2008/06/05/scotch-on-the-rocks-day-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwessel</title>
		<link>http://www.borrewessel.com/2008/06/05/scotch-on-the-rocks-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>bwessel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borrewessel.com/?p=9#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Sorry, there wasn&#039;t any recording on Scotch on the Rocks. I totally agree, mixing Cairngorm and Modules can be difficult, but there are alternatives. If you are using for example HttpServices I&#039;m not sure how much value Cairngorm actually adds, i would rather look at Parsley or Spring Actionscript, and other ways of modeling your application. Cairngorm is good for organizing your code, and will help an inexperienced team get started, but for larger projects and applications I would not use it, it adds too many classes with limited value, and it adds far too much maintenance for your code base in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, there wasn&#8217;t any recording on Scotch on the Rocks. I totally agree, mixing Cairngorm and Modules can be difficult, but there are alternatives. If you are using for example HttpServices I&#8217;m not sure how much value Cairngorm actually adds, i would rather look at Parsley or Spring Actionscript, and other ways of modeling your application. Cairngorm is good for organizing your code, and will help an inexperienced team get started, but for larger projects and applications I would not use it, it adds too many classes with limited value, and it adds far too much maintenance for your code base in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Battershall</title>
		<link>http://www.borrewessel.com/2008/06/05/scotch-on-the-rocks-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Battershall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borrewessel.com/?p=9#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Borre,

I looked through your PDF and it is excellent.  I was wondering whether your presentation was recorded (audio or video).  The issue of architecture best practices with Cairngorm/Modules is something I&#039;m really trying to grasp.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borre,</p>
<p>I looked through your PDF and it is excellent.  I was wondering whether your presentation was recorded (audio or video).  The issue of architecture best practices with Cairngorm/Modules is something I&#8217;m really trying to grasp.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
